2005 -- 2018  AbundantHope.net
Phoenix Journal Selections 
param>Google Translate param>
WW II - THE HOLOCAUST, part 4 SUDDEN SURVIVORS The circumstances surrounding the Warsaw Ghetto revolt, as well as the deportations to eastern labor camps such as Auschwitz, has led to the most colorful tales concerning the fate of Polish Jews, the largest bloc of Jewry in Europe. The Jewish Joint Distribution Committee, in figures prepared by them for the Nuremberg Trials, stated that in 1945 there were only 80,000 Jews remaining in Poland. They also alleged that there were no Polish-Jewish displaced persons left in Germany or Austria, a claim that was at some variance with the number of Polish Jews arrested by the British and Americans for black market activities. However, the new Communist regime in Poland was unable to prevent a major anti- Jewish pogrom at Kielce on July 4th, 1946, and more than 150,000 Polish Jews suddenly fled into Western Germany. Their appearance was somewhat embarrassing, and their emigration to Palestine and the United States was carried out in record time. Subsequently, the number of Polish Jewish survivors underwent considerable revision; in the American-Jewish Year Book 1948-1949 it was placed at 390,000, quite an advance on the original 80,000. You may expect further revisions upwards in the future as things unfold. SOME CONCENTRATION CAMP MEMOIRS The most influential agency in the propagation of the extermination legend has been the paper-back book and magazine industry, and it is through their sensational publications, produced for commercial gain, that the average person is made acquainted with a myth of an entirely political character and purpose. The hey-day of these hate-Germany books was in the 1950‟s, when virulent Germano-phobia found a ready market, but the industry continues to flourish and is experiencing another boom today and increases by leaps and bounds annually. The industry‟s products consist generally of so-called “memoirs”, and these fall into two basic categories: those which are supposedly by former S.S. men, camp commandants and the like, and those bloodcurdling reminiscences allegedly by former concentration camp inmates. COMMUNIST ORIGINS Here is where you had best begin to pay careful attention so that you get the “hook-up” because this IS, after all, the most elaborate plan at One World Government ever on your planet. Of the first kind, the most outstanding example is COMMANDANT OF AUSCHWITZ by Rudolf Hoess (London, 1960), which was originally published in the Polish language as Wspomnienia by the Communist Government. Hoess, a young man who took over at Auschwitz in 1940, was first arrested by the British and detained at Flensburg, but he was soon handed over to the Polish Communist authorities who condemned him to death in 1947 and executed him almost immediately. -- PJ 40 -- pag. 130 The so-called Hoess memoirs are undoubtedly false and were produced under Communist auspices, as you shall see, though the Communists themselves claim that Hoess was “ordered to write the story of his life” and a hand-written original supposedly exists, but no one has ever seen it. Hoess was subjected to incredible torture and brain-washing as only the Communist Psychopoliticians can inflict it during the period of his arrest, and his testimony at Nuremberg was delivered in a mindless monotone as he stared blankly into space. Even Reitlinger rejects this testimony as hopelessly untrustworthy. It is indeed remarkable how much of the “evidence” regarding the Six Million stems from Communist sources; this includes the major documents such as the Wisliceny statement and the Hoess “memoirs”, which are undoubtedly the two most quoted items in extermination literature, as well as all the information on the so-called “death camps” such as Auschwitz. This information comes from the Jewish Historical Commission of Poland; the Central Commission for the Investigation of War Crimes, Warsaw; and the Russian State War Crimes Commission, Moscow. Reitlinger acknowledges that the Hoess testimony at Nuremberg was a catalog of wild exaggerations, such as that Auschwitz was disposing of 16,000 people a day, which would mean a total at the end of the war of over 13 million. Instead of exposing such estimates for the Soviet- inspired frauds they obviously are, Reitlinger and others prefer to think that such ridiculous exaggerations were due to “pride‟ in doing a professional job. Ironically, this is completely irreconcilable with the supposedly authentic Hoess memoirs, which make a clever attempt at plausibility by suggesting the opposite picture of distaste for the job. Hoess is supposed to have “confessed” to a total of 3 million people exterminated at Auschwitz, though at his own trial in Warsaw the prosecution reduced the number to 1,135,000. However, we have already noted that the Soviet government announced an official figure of 4 million after their “investigation” of the camp in 1945. This kind of casual juggling with millions of people does not appear to worry the writers of the extermination literature. A review of the Hoess “memoirs” in all their horrid detail would be tedious. We may confine ourselves to those aspects of the extermination legend which are designed with the obvious purpose of forestalling any proof of its falsity. Such, for example, is the manner in which the alleged extermination of Jews is described. This was supposed to have been carried out by a “special detachment” of Jewish prisoners. They took charge of the newly arrived contingents at the camp, led them into the enormous “gas-chambers” and disposed of the bodies afterwards. The S.S., therefore, did very little, so that most of the S.S. personnel at the camp could be left in complete ignorance of the “extermination program”. Of course, no Jew would ever be found who claimed to have been a member of this gruesome “special detachment”, so that the whole issue is left conveniently unprovable. It is worth repeating that no living, authentic eyewitness of these events has ever been produced. Conclusive evidence that the Hoess memoirs are a forgery lies in an incredible slip by the Communist editors. Hoess is supposed to say that the Jehovah's Witnesses at Auschwitz approved -- PJ 40 -- pag. 131 of murdering the Jews because the Jews were the enemies of Christ. It is well known that in Soviet Russia today and in all her satellite countries of eastern Europe, the Communists conduct a bitter campaign of suppression against the Jehovah's Witnesses, whom they regard as the religious sect most dangerous to Communist beliefs. That this sect is deliberately and grossly defamed in the Hoess memoirs proves the document's Communist origins beyond any doubt. INCRIMINATING REMINISCENCES Certainly the most bogus “memoirs” yet published are those of Adolf Eichmann. Before his illegal kidnapping by the Israelis in May, 1960 and the attendant blaze of international publicity, few people had ever hear of him. He was indeed a relatively unimportant person, the head of Office A4b in Department IV (the Gestapo) of the Reich Security Head Office. His office supervised the transportation to detention camps of a particular section of enemy aliens, the Jews. A positive flood of unadulterated rubbish about Eichmann showered the world in 1960, of which we may cite as an example Homer Clarke's EICHMANN THE SAVAGE TRUTH. (“The orgies often went on until six in the morning, a few hours before consigning the next batch of victims to death,” says Clarke in his chapter “Streamlined Death, Wild Sex Orgies”, p. 124.) Strangely enough, the alleged “memoirs” of Adolf Eichmann suddenly appeared at the time of his abduction to Israel. They were uncritically published by the American “Life” magazine (Nov. 28, Dec. 5, 1960), and were supposed to have been given by Eichmann to a journalist in the Argentine shortly before his capture--an amazing coincidence. Other sources, however, gave an entirely different account of their origin, claiming that they were a record based on Eichmann's comments to an “associate” in 1955, though no one even bothered to identify this person. By an equally extraordinary coincidence, war crimes investigators claimed shortly afterwards to have just “found” in the archives of the U.S. Library of Congress, more than fifteen years after the war, the “complete file” of Eichmann's department. So far as the “memoirs” themselves are concerned, they were made to be as horribly incriminating as possible without straying too far into the realms of the purest fantasy, and depict Eichmann speaking with enormous relish about “the physical annihilation of the Jews”. Their fraudulence is also attested to by various factual errors, such as that Himmler was already in command of the Reserve Army by April of 1944, instead of after the July plot against Hitler's life, a fact which Eichmann would certainly have known. The appearance of these “memoirs” at precisely the right moment leaves no doubt that their object was to present a pre-trial propaganda picture of the archetypal “unregenerate Nazi and fiend in human shape”.   The circumstances of the Eichmann trial in Israel do not concern us here; the documents of Soviet Origin which were used in evidence, such as the Wisliceny statement, have been examined already, and for an account of the third-degree methods used on Eichmann during his captivity to render him “co-operative” the reader is referred to the London Jewish Chronicle, Sept. 2, 1960. More relevant to the literature of the extermination legend are the contents of a letter which Eichmann is supposed to have written voluntarily and handed over to his captors in Buenos Aries. It need hardly be added -- PJ 40 -- pag. 132 that its Israeli authorship is transparently obvious. Nothing in it stretches human credulity further than the phrase “I am submitting this declaration of my own free will,” but the most hollow and revealing statement of all is his alleged willingness to appear before a court in Israel, “so that a true picture may be transmitted to future generations.” Now you who are in knowledge of possibilities contained herein, please be patient and keep to the subject. It matters not whether this man was an “imposter”, “synthetic”, “double” or just the “same old man”- -for the intent is the same and that is to further deepen the deceit by whatever means necessary to keep the world from finding out in time to stop the move for world control. TREBLINKA FABRICATIONS One of the latest reminiscences to appear in print are those of Franz Stangl, the former commandant of the camp of Treblinka in Poland who was sentenced to life imprisonment in Dec. 1970. These were published in an article by the London Daily Telegraph Magazine, Oct. 8, 1971, and were supposed to derive from a series of interviews with Stangl in prison. He died a few days after the interviews were concluded. These alleged reminiscences are certainly the goriest and most bizarre yet published, though one is grateful for a few admissions by the writer of the article, such as that “the evidence presented in the course of his trial did not prove Stangl himself to have committed specific acts of murder” and that the account of Stangl's beginnings in Poland “was in part fabrication”. A typical example of this fabrication was the description of Stangl's first visit to Treblinka. As he drew into the railway station there, he is supposed to have seen “thousands of bodies” just strewn around next to the tracks, “hundreds, no, thousands of bodies everywhere, putrefying, decomposing”. And “in the station was a train full of Jews, some dead, some still alive.. .it looked as if it had been there for days.” The account reaches the heights of absurdity when Stangl is alleged to have got out of his car and “stepped knee deep into money; I didn't know which way to turn, which way to go. I waded in paper notes, currency, precious stones, jewellery and clothes. They were everywhere, strewn all over the square.” The scene is completed by “whores from Warsaw weaving drunk, dancing, singing, playing music”, who were on the other side of the barbed wire fences. To literally believe this account of sinking “knee deep” in Jewish banknotes and precious stones amid thousands of putrefying corpses and lurching, singing prostitutes would require the most phenomenal degree of gullibility, and in any circumstances other than the Six Million legend it would be dismissed as the most outrageous nonsense. The statement which certainly robs the Stangl memoirs of any vestige of authenticity is his alleged reply when asked why he thought the Jews were being exterminated: “They wanted the Jews‟ money,” is the answer. “That racial business was just secondary.” The series of interviews are supposed to have ended on a highly dubious note indeed. When asked whether he thought there had been “any conceivable sense in this horror”, the former Nazi commandant supposedly replied with enthusiasm: “Yes, I am sure there was. Perhaps the Jews were meant to have this enormous jolt to -- PJ 40 -- pag. 133 pull them together; to create a peopie; to identify themselves with each other”. One could scarcely imagine a more perfect answer had it been invented! Let us have a break at this point prior to taking up the so-called Diary of Anne Frank. Thank you, Hatonn (CM) -- PJ 40 -- pag. 134 --- When you can no longer speak out in your opinion regarding possibility of incorrectness of given issues-- you are a lost people. I remind you that the Zionists leagues have proposed legislation before your Congress to make it “illegal” to even disagree with their presentation of what happened at the so-called Holocaust. I remind you that in France, Germany, England, Canada and the Soviet Union (and several other European nations) IT IS NOW ILLEGAL TO EVEN HAVE AND VOICE AN OPINION THAT INFERS THE HOLOCAUST DID NOT OCCUR-- EVEN “DIFFERING” IN NUMBERS OR OTHERWISE SPECULATION AS TO POSSIBILITIES OTHER THAN GIVEN YOU BY THE ZIONISTS. This is the most vile and evil form of moral blackmail and financial extortion. The bill is in present argument before the Australian Law Reform Commission--to make denial of the orthodox version of the holocaust a “hate crime”. Who is that “hate” against? -- PJ 40 -- pag. 136 You better look again--it makes YOU the victim of “hate crime” IF YOU DISAGREE!Oh, you think I am bigoted and want to deny right to change laws to protect the public? The “public” is not bringing any of these suggestions, even before the United Nations (as is also under way), it is brought forth by the Jewish Leagues and announced through “Jewish” press. In Australia, for instance, in September (27), 1991 it is announced that the Secretary of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry and Sydney (Australia) director of Australia/Israel publications, has asked “. . . the Australian Law Reform Commission to make denial of the orthodox version of the holocaust a „hate crime‟.” I don't know how you can better sum it up than in their own words. How is it that these ones proudly announce themselves “Jews” and yet if another calls them “Jew” it is unacceptable? What are you doing, World? FACTS We will continue to give you “facts”. For this deed, the people are continually under threat of death by the self-proclaimed Zionists. They identify their origin only leaving personal identification missing. The papers and books are publicly burned and a special packet of threats has gone from the ADL (Jewish Anti-Defamation League) to every known TV station and Radio station. IS THIS FREEDOM IN AMERICA? YOU ALLOW YOUR GOVERNMENT TO PAY FOR MUSEUM PRODUCTIONS OF HOMOSEXUAL SEXUAL ACTS IN PICTURES, PORNOGRAPHIC PLAYS ARE PRESENTED THROUGH GOVERNMENT FUNDING, AND OTHER PORNOGRAPHIC MATERIAL IS BLESSED--BUT WHEN SOMEONE SPEAKS OUT AND SAYS, “HEY. HERE IS EVIDENCE THAT SOMETHING MIGHT BE A BIT WRONG WITH NUMBERS AND PRESENTATION OF A THING CALLED THE HOLOCAUST”--YOU ARE THREATENED WITH DEATH! THIS THREATENING COMES FROM THE VERY GROUP WHO GAVE FORTH THE ORTHODOX VERSION !!! MIGHT IT BE A BIT WISE FOR YOU TO ALSO OUESTION INTENT? Well, today it is still “legal” to write in differing opinion and therefore, we shall write as quickly as the little fingers can move--TO BRING YOU THE COMPILED FACTS SO THAT YOU CAN JUDGE ON FACTS AND NOT EMOTION. I ONLY ASK HEARING FOR IF YOU CANNOT COME INTO BALANCE THROUGH TRUTH THERE IS NOT MUCH GOD CAN OFFER UNTO YOU. SO BE IT. Dharma, we have hundreds of pages to present on this matter and, therefore, we must attend it while we can do so. You of the world populace have been such “people-of-the-LIES” for so long that you have ceased to “think”. It is time to “reason” lest you never be given another chance upon this wondrous place called “Earth”. -- PJ 40 -- pag. 137 This is the task I have been sent forth to do, and so shall it be done--what you do with the Truth is of your own choosing. Amen. BEST-SELLER IS A HOAX Of the other variety of memoirs, those which present a picture of frail Jewry caught in the vice of Nazism, the most celebrated is undoubtedly THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK, and the truth concerning this book is only one appalling insight into the fabrication of the propaganda legend. It has already been proven over and over again as a hoax, but the media and Zionists continue to deny the facts and continue to silence the truth-bringers. I only give that which has been presented to you over and over again. Why don't YOU know about these things? Because the contradiction is NEVER ALLOWED ON THE MEDIA OR IN THE PRESS IN ANY WAY WHICH GAINS ATTENTION. BOOKS CONTAINING THE TRUTH ARE BANISHED AND A SPECIAL FOOTBALL GAME WILL BE AIRED IN THE SLOT WHEREIN SOMEONE MIGHT HAVE GIVEN YOU SOME TRUTH. First published in 1952, THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANKbecame an immediate best-seller; since then it has been republished in paper-back, going through 40 impressions, and was made into a successful Hollywood film. In royalties alone, Otto Frank, the girl's father, has made a fortune from the sale of the book, which purports to represent the real-life tragedy of his daughter. With its direct appeal to the emotions, the book and the film have influenced literally millions of people, certainly more throughout the world than any other story of its kind. And yet only seven years after its initial publication A NEW YORK SUPREME COURT CASE ESTABLISHED THAT THE BOOK WAS A HOAX. It is the way in which the book is presented that is the problem. If it had been presented as a novel of “fiction” and drama--excellent--for it is sensitive and emotionally captivating. But this is NOT that which happened. THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANKhas been sold to the public as the actual diary of a young Jewish girl from Amsterdam, which she wrote at the age of 12 while her family and four other Jews were hiding in the back room of a house during the German occupation. Eventually, they were arrested and detained in a concentration camp, where Anne Frank supposedly died when she was 14. When Otto Frank was liberated from the camp at the end of the war, he returned to the Amsterdam house and “found” his daughter's diary concealed in the rafters. The truth about the Anne Frank Diary was first revealed in 1959 by the Swedish journal Fria Ord. It established that the Jewish novelist Meyer Levin had written the dialogue of the “diary” and was demanding payment for his work in a court action against Otto Frank. A condensation of the Swedish articles appeared in the American Economic Council Letter, April 15, 1959, as follows: -- PJ 40 -- pag. 138 “History has many examples of myths that live a longer and richer life than truth, and may become more effective than truth. “The Western World has for some years been made aware of a Jewish girl through the medium of what purports to be her personally written story, Anne Frank's Diary. Any informed literary inspection of this book would have shown it to have been impossible as the work of a teenager.” [H: This is NOT the reasoning which is valid, however, for one does not “judge” on such opinion but on merit of facts presented] “A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in that the well known American Jewish writer, Meyer Levin, has been awarded $50,000 to be paid him by the father of Anne Frank as an honorarium for Levin‟s work on the Anne Frank Diary. “Mr. Frank, in Switzerland, promised to pay to his race kin, Meyer Levin, not less than $50,000 because he had used the dialogue of Author Levin just as it was and „implanted‟ it in the diary as being his daughter's intellectual work.” Further inquiries brought a reply on May 7th, 1962 from a firm of New York lawyers, which stated: “I was the attorney for Meyer Levin in his action against Otto Frank, and others. It is true that a jury awarded Mr. Levin $50,000 in damages, as indicated in your letter. That award was later set aside by trial justice. Hon. Samuel C. Coleman, on the ground that the damages had not been proved in the manner required by law. The action was subsequently settled while an appeal from Judge Coleman‟s decision was pending. “I am afraid that the case itself is not officially reported, so far as the trial itself, or even Judge Coleman's decision, is concerned. Certain procedural matters were reported in 141 New York Supplement, Second Series 170, and in 5 Second Series 181. The correct file number in the New York County Clerk‟s office is 2241-1956 and the file is probably a large and full one...” Here, then, is just one more fraud in a whole series of frauds perpetrated in support of the “Holocaust” legend and the saga of the Six Million. Of course, the court case bearing directly on the authenticity of the Anne Frank Diary was “not officially reported”. A brief reference may also be made to another “diary”, published not long after that of Anne Frank and entitled: NOTES FROM THE WARSAW GHETTO THE JOURNAL OF EMMANUEL -- PJ 40 -- pag. 139 RINGELBLUM (New York, 1958). Ringelblum had been a leader in the campaign of sabotage against the Germans in Poland, as well as the revolt of the Warsaw Ghetto in 1943, before he was eventually arrested and executed in 1944. It is a MUST to constantly remind yourselves of the facts herein regarding the REASON the “Jews” were in that Ghetto: The “Jews” had also declared to be in a State of War against Germany. America had already put all American Japanese citizens and any Japanese in the States into concentration (detention) camps. This was the same event in Germany only with Jews--who bad declared war against Germany and were, in fact, having constant war encounters. The gathering up of Jews didn't “just happen”--the Jews declared a state of war. The Ringelblum journal, which speaks of the usual “rumors” allegedly circulating about the extermination of the Jews in Poland, appeared under exactly the same Communist auspices as the so-called bess memoirs. McGraw-Hill, the publishers of the American edition, admit that they were denied access to the uncensored original manuscript in Warsaw, and instead faithfully followed the expurgated volume published by the Communist Government in Warsaw in 1952. All the “proofs” of the Holocaust issuing from Communist sources of this kind are worthless as historical documents. Since the war, there has been an abundant growth of sensational concentration camp literature, the majority of it Jewish, each book piling horror upon horror, blending fragments of truth with the most grotesque of fantasies and impostures, relentlessly creating an edifice of mythology in which any relations to historical fact has long since disappeared. We have referred to the type already--Olga Lengyel's absurd FIVE CHIMNEYS (“24,000 corpses handled every day”). The truth is terrible enough and to lie causes all respect to leave for that horror which was actually present. You have to realize, dear ones, that this is part and parcel of the “plan” to deceive and thereby move into one world control over you-the- masses. It is directly accomplished through the traditions, such as the “Kol Nidre” whereby annually on Day of Atonement--the vows are rendered negated until the following Day of Atonement. The Protocols “order” that the Talmudists (Zionists) lie, cheat, steal and do anything necessary to accomplish the ends of World Domination. Another couple of books which represent the same type of issue are DOCTOR AT AUSCHWITZ by Miklos Nyiszli, apparently a mythical and invented person, THIS WAS AUSCHWITZ: THE STORY OF A MURDER CAMP by Philip Friedman, and so on ad nauseam. Another in this same vein is FOR THOSE I LOVED by Martin Gray (Bodley Head, 1973), which purports to be an account of his experiences at Treblinka camp in Poland. Gray specialized in selling fake antiques to America before turning to concentration camp memoirs. The -- PJ 40 -- pag. 140 circumstances surrounding the publication of his book, however, have been unique, because for the first time with works of this kind, serious doubt was cast on the authenticity of its contents. Even Jews, alarmed at the damage it might cause, denounced his book as fraudulent and questioned whether he had ever been at Treblinka at all, while B.B.C. radio pressed him as to why he had waited 28 years before writing of his experiences. You all must realize that it is only the few who know the truth of these lies. Ones who came out of the concentration camps to find family members still living never thought further than the ones who came out and found all missing. There was no way to KNOW what transpired in another place--even the next room. Circumstances were terrible at best and the stories would be accepted without question--just as YOU do that your Government is Pure and Works in your Behalf! Your senses tell you otherwise but it is easier and more comforting to believe the “orthodox” ideas. As these ones who escaped are shown pictures supposedly of Auschwitz--how can they know the pictures came from an Eisenhower prison camp of death? As you come into discernment, this is WHY you must attend facts as given and THEN, ONLY THEN, decide how it might have been other than given. It was interesting to observe that the “Personal Opinion” column of the London Jewish Chronicle, March 29, 1973, although it roundly condemned Gray's book, nevertheless made grandiose additions to the myth of the Six Million. It stated that: “Nearly a million people were murdered in Treblinka in the course of a year, 18,000 were fed into the gas chambers every day.” It is a pity indeed that so many people read and accept this kind of nonsense without so much as exercising their minds. If 18,000 were murdered every day, the figure of one million would be reached in a mere 56 days, not “in the course of a year”. This gigantic achievement would leave the remaining ten months of the year a total blank. 18,000 every day would in fact mean a total of 6,480,000” “in the course of a year”. Does this mean that the Six Million died in twelve months at Treblinka? What about the alleged three or four million at Auschwitz? This kind of thing simply shows that, once the preposterous compromise figure of Six Million had scored a resounding success and become internationally accepted, any number of impossible permutations can be made and no one would even think to criticize them. In its review of Gray's book, the Jewish Chronicle column also provides a revealing insight into the fraudulent allegations concerning gas-chambers: “Gray recalls that the floors of the gas chambers sloped, whereas another survivor who helped to build them maintains that they were at a level...” Occasionally, books by former concentration camp inmates appear which present a totally different picture of the conditions prevailing in them. Such is UNDER TWO DICTATORS (London, 1950) by Marguerite Buber. She was a German-Jewish woman who had experienced several years in the brutal and primitive conditions of a Russian prison camp before being sent to Ravensbruck, the German camp for women detainees, in August 1940. She noted that she was the only Jewish person in her contingent of deportees from Russia who was not straight away released from the Gestapo. -- PJ 40 -- pag. 141 Her book presents a striking contrast between the camps of Soviet Russia and Germany; compared to the squalor, disorder and starvation of the Russian camp, she found Ravensbruck to be clean, civilized and well- administered. Regular baths (showers) and clean linen seemed a luxury after her earlier experiences, and her first meal of white bread, sausage, sweet porridge and dried fruit prompted her to inquire of another camp inmate whether August 3rd, 1940 was some sort of holiday or special occasion. She observed, too, that the barracks at Ravensbruck were remarkably spacious compared to the crowded mud hut of the Soviet camp. In the final months of 1945, she experienced the progressive decline of camp conditions, the causes of which we shall examine later. Another account which is at total variance with popular propaganda is Die Gestapo Lasst Bitten (The Gestapo Invites You) by Charlotte Bormann, a Communist political prisoner who was also interned at Ravensbruck. Undoubtedly its most important revelation is the author's statement that rumors of gas executions were deliberate and malicious inventions circulated among the prisoners by the Communists. This latter group did not accept Marguerite Buber because of her imprisonment in Soviet Russia. A further shocking reflection on the post-war trials is the fact that Charlotte Bormann was not permitted to testify at the Rastadt trial of Ravensbruck camp personnel in the French occupation zone, the usual fate of those who denied the extermination legend. You say, “Well, these discounters can't be believed!” Why? You believe the exaggerated and totally impossible tales of the opposition which is far more heinous to believe! I don't ask that you “believe” one against another--JUST LOOK AT THE FACTS!!! Let us take a bit of a rest-break before we take up the subject of the nature and condition of those war-time concentration camps. I would remind all of you that concentration camps are exactly what their name implies and in war, it means a very tacky situation at best. There certainly were camps in which Death should have been the first name--but precious ones, they seem to all be found inside the control of the Iron Curtain Communist Zionists. It always comes back to haunt all of you--and MUST BE FACED! And still--NONE can begin to compare with the horror of the Eisenhower Death Camps--NONE! Hatonn to clear. -- PJ 40 -- pag. 142 NEXT PAGE