2005 -- 2019  AbundantHope.net
Phoenix Journal Selections 
param>Google Translate param>
Hitler in the Pj's  5 But Eisenhower’s hatred of the Germans, which was openly shown many times during those terrible days of the war, demanded that as many Germans as possible be made to suffer for their part in the war. It might be well to state here, that as early as 1902, International “Zionism” had a plan for the destruction of what was recognized as “Christianity” in Europe. This called for the destruction, first of Czarist Russia (note I did NOT say “Khazarian Zionist Russia”) which took place in 1917 with the same people financing the war, and then for the destruction of Germany. A war chest of some $2-billion (and in those days THAT WAS A LOT OF MONEY!) WAS SET ASIDE FOR THIS PURPOSE, LONG BEFORE A MAN NAMED ADOLF HITLER EVEN CAME ON THE SCENE. When Churchill and F.D.R. listened to the advice of Stalin, instead of their two best military leaders, it gave Stalin two years to establish control over all of Eastern Europe, which is now known as the Warsaw Pact Nations. -- PJ 40 -- pag. 115 As a matter of FACT, when we finish the other document regarding the Death Camps (so-called) of Hitler--you are going to find another blow to your senses; as you have to realize that the camps which have ever been in question as possible extermination camps were in territories which came under control of the Communists. It was at that time the “terrible Swedish Jew” Eisenhower, whose open hatred of everything German, caused him to promote Operation Keelhaul” at the end of the war, where thousands of anti-Communist fighters, who had surrendered to American forces, were forced, at bayonet point, back to the tender mercies of the Communists. Thousands of them were murdered outright, or disappeared into the Gulags of Russia. Surely you remember that I have also told you that you have many missing men from Korea--IN SOVIET PRISONS--TODAY (ALIVE)! Eisenhower returned to the States, made a hero by the controlled prostitute press of America, and his popularity from the populace he had betrayed was such that he became the 34th President of the United States in 1953. -- PJ 40 -- pag. 116 In terms of numbers, Polish Jewry is supposed to have suffered most of all from extermination, not only at Auschwitz, but at an endless list of newly-discovered “death camps” such as Treblinka, Sobibor, Belzec, Chelmno, Maidanek and at many more obscure places which seem suddenly to have gained prominence. At the center of the alleged extermination of the Polish Jews is the dramatic uprising in April 1943 of the Warsaw Ghetto. This is often represented as a revolt against being deported to gas ovens; presumably the alleged subject of Hitler and Himmler‟s “secret discussions” had leaked out and gained wide publicity in Warsaw. The case of the Warsaw Ghetto is an instructive insight into the creation of the extermination legend itself. Indeed, its evacuation by the Germans in 1943 is often referred to as the “extermination of the Polish Jews” although it was nothing of the kind, and layers of mythology have tended to surround it after the publication of sensational novels like John Hersey‟s The Wall and Leon Uris‟ Exodus. When the Germans first occupied Poland, they confined the Jews, not in detention camps but in ghettos for reasons of security. The interior administration of the ghettos was in the hands of Jewish Councils elected by themselves--remember the Jews had openly stated that they were hostile and would join the armed forces against the Germans. These ghettos were policed by independent Jewish police forces. Special currency notes were introduced into the ghettos to prevent speculation. Whether this system was right or wrong, it was somewhat understandable in time of war, and although the ghetto is perhaps an unpleasant social establishment, it is by no means barbaric unless ones within the group choose to be barbaric against their own people. And it is certainly not an organization for the destruction of a race. But, of course, it is frequently said that this is what the ghettos were really for. It has been published, regarding the Warsaw Ghetto, a brazen assertion that concentration camps “were a substitute for the practice of cramming the Jews into overcrowded ghettos and starving them to death.” It seems that whatever security system the Germans used, and to whatever lengths they went to preserve a semblance of community for the Jews, they can never escape the charge of “extermination”. Even to the point of requiring national LAWS that prohibit even the “discussion” of possible flaws in the Holocaust reporting. -- PJ 40 -- pag. 128 In his recent book ADOLF HITLER (London, 1973), Colin Cross, who brings more intelligence than is usual to many problems of this period, observes astutely that “The shuffling of millions of Jews around Europe and murdering them, in a time of desperate war emergency, was useless from any rational point of view” (p. 307). How many of you can relate to just having family and relatives, say a large family of 20, to a special Thanksgiving dinner and they are there as your guests for the week-end. Taking this tiny little “blip” of possibility a bit further; now take this little gathering for three days of meals, bathing, sleeping, etc., etc., and multiply it to 50, 100, 1000-- now try a million--3 million--6 million! Now, while you are trying to fix this celebration dinner, you also have a full- blown bombing war going on, the power goes off and you have no cooking facilities, the dog kills the cat after it ate the pet canary, the babies are teething and have chicken pox and the in-laws find dust on the furniture. Now, you have to stop what you are doing and murder all these people and dispose (totally) of the bodies for you must not have any evidence of the act remaining! You may actually, at this point, feel like doing just that--but it becomes totally impractical to consider as a feasible course of action. Does it not leave consideration of possibilities of perceptions which are simply not true? You ones must begin to put these things into reasonable perspective and THEN look at possibilities and PROBABILITIES. -- PJ 40 -- pag. 143 Without doubt the most important contribution to a truthful study of the extermination question has been the work of the French historian, Professor Paul Rassinier. The pre-eminent value of this work lies first in the fact that Rassinier actually experienced life in the German concentration camps, and also that, as a Socialist Intellectual and anti-Nazi, nobody could be less inclined to defend Hitler and National Socialism, Yet. for the sake of justice and historical truth, Rassinier spent the remainder of his post-war years until his death in 1966 pursuing research which utterly refuted the Myth of the Six Million and the legend of Nazi diabolism. DO YOU NOT YET SEE? YOUR ENEMY WAS NEVER THE NAZI GERMANS--YOUR ENEMY HAS ALWAYS BEEN THE SOVIET KHAZARIANS WHO TOOK THE FORM OF KHAZARIAN ZIONISTS. THEY WARNED YOU, THESE SOVIETS--”WE WILL TAKE YOU (AMERICA) WITHOUT EVEN FIRING A SHOT!” and Lenin‟s “We will hang them (Americans) and they will give us the rope with which to do it!” -- PJ 40 -- pag. 159 Perhaps I may be allowed to recall here that the State of Israel was only founded in May 1948, and that the Jews were nationals of all states with the exception of Israel, in order to underline the dimensions of a fraud which defies description in any language; on the one hand Germany pays to Israel sums which are calculated on six million dead, and on the other, since at least four-fifths of these six million were decidedly ALIVE at the end of the war, she is paying substantial sums by way of reparation to the victims of Hitler‟s Germany to those who are still alive in countries all over the world other than Israel and to the rightful claimants of those who have since deceased, which means that for the former (i.e., the six million), or in other words, for the vast majority, she is PAYING TWICE. NOT A BAD DEAL! -- PJ 40 -- pag. 164 ---------------------------- CONCLUSIONS OF RESEARCHERS IN FACTS * The "Hitler gas chambers" never existed. * The "genocide" (or the "attempted genocide") of the Jews never took place. In other words, Hitler never gave an order nor permission that anyone should be killed because of his race or religion. * The alleged "gas chambers" and the alleged "genocide" are one and the same lie. * This lie, which is largely of Zionist origin, has made an enormous political and financial fraud possible, whose principal beneficiary is the state of Israel. * The principal victims of this lie and fraud are the German people (but not the German rulers) and the entire Palestinian people. * The enormous power of official information services has, thus far, had the effect of ensuring the success of the lie and of censuring the freedom of expression of those who have denounced the lie. * The participants in the lie know that its days are numbered; they distort the purpose and nature of revisionist research; they label as "resurgence of Nazism" or as "falsification of history" what is only a thoughtful and justified concern for historical truth. -- PJ 41 -- pag. 16 It also accounts for the more dramatic illusions generated by the Establishment, that Pearl Harbor was a "surprise attack", that the U.S. faced destruction if Germany prevailed in the war in Europe, and that a 13-year-old girl wrote a book called THE DIARY OF ANNE FRANK.  -- PJ 41 -- page 24 The goal, of course, is to get America's young cannon fodder to die in a "holy war"--exactly as just happened in Grenada, Panama and the sands of the Persian Gulf. Thus you were told Hitler was "butchering Jews and using the skins for lampshades".The imagination of the propagandists can be ghoulish. Moreover, the Zionists (as shown again in the Persian Gulf charade) are the perfection of deceit and lies. They control the media and press and therefore give you the only information you receive. Time places a merciful mist on the public mind, and such innocent fabrications as the jig dancing and carpet-chewing can be laughed off as "good fun during wartime". You know, sort of like "dirty tricks" in elections and political circles. It's not enough to hate your enemy--a bit of contempt keeps morale high. How could you have gotten your young men to bomb women and children and bury 12,000 soldiers alive in trenches without this deceitful contempt for some man called Saddam? It never seemed to occur to anyone that Saddam was the ONLY one telling the truth! You were fighting one more war for British Israel and nothing short of the goal was acceptable. Your politicians now tell you all about that "decisive victory" but you didn't have a decisive anything except terror and war crimes against humanity and Israel's enemy. -- PJ 41 -- pag. 25 Said Lewis Brandon, executive secretary of the institute: "So many 'holocaust' witnesses have told contradictory stories, reneged on their testimony or been proven to be liars that we believe that the reward will lie unclaimed for a very long time. To make sure that the proper word of the offer is disseminated among interested parties, including claimed 'survivors of Hitler's gas ovens', we intend to forward our offer to all publishers of so-called ' witness books' with the request that the alleged witnesses step forward to have their evidence examined by a panel of academics." (The Institute for Historical Review can be contacted by writing to P.O. Box 1306, Torrance, California, 96505). -- PJ 41 -- pag. 33 Auschwitz, you must remember, was an important manufacturing center for Germany; it was there that Buna rubber was made from coal--vital for the manufacture of tires. With a great shortage of labor in wartime Europe, the Germans were far more interested in producing material for Hitler's war machine than in gassing potential workers. No people were ever gassed at Auschwitz or any other German internment camp, and there was never any policy of extermination of Jews. The industries, I remind you, were owned by Zionists of the Elite Bankers who were also financing both sides of the war. -- PJ 41 -- pag. 37 App branded the "re-education" of Germany as unique in history but necessary to make the energetic Germans a slave nation for the support of postwar Communism and Zionism, neither of which can survive without German support. App estimates that Zionist blackmail of Germany has produced about 100 billion German marks for Israel in aid of all sorts, including the entire telephone system of Israel, the rail system, diesel locomotives, boxcars, 59 ocean-going ships, a dry dock, a copper plant, all electrical plants and many other gifts, including a generous pension for every Jew who says he or she "escaped Hitler's gas ovens"--including those who left with all of their property and others who have NEVER EVEN BEEN IN GERMANY! It has been the greatest theft in recorded history--a theft which should be of intense interest to all taxpaying Americans because you, too, are captives of Israeli aggressors--thanks to such hate-mongering organizations as the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith (ADL). -- PJ 41 -- pag. 38 I shall ask Dharma to take up scribing on page 79 of the document. I am only interested in that portion specific to the subject in point in this JOURNAL. You would enjoy the whole of the book but I do not wish to consider it herein for I am not interested in "books"-- only in subject. QUOTE: (Editor's Note: This is an "English" book; no attempt has been made to conform the spellings, punctuation and grammar to "American"). Hitler's view of the Jews and the Jewish problem is sharply expressed in Mein Kampf. He goes to great lengths to demonstrate that his Jew-hatred was quite reasonable, that it flowed from experience and the logical inferences to be drawn from clear evidence. He always insisted that his first thoughts towards the Jews were all benign. His father, "the old gentleman", looked upon anti-Semitism as a left-over religious prejudice and so, we are told, did the enlightened young Adolf. It was only after his mother died, and he moved from provincial Linz to Vienna, that Hitler found occasion to question the glib assumptions of his youth. For there he wandered through the old inner city and encountered a Galician Hasid, "an apparition in a black caftan and black hair locks. Is this a Jew? was my first thought". But the more he thought about what he had seen the more his question assumed a new form: "Is this a German"? It is in the context of his earliest ruminations on what was, for him, the central question of existence that introduced Zionism into his opus. And whatever doubts I may still have nourished were finally dispelled by the attitude of a portion of the Jews themselves. Among them there was a great movement, quite extensive in Vienna, which came out sharply in confirmation of the national character of the Jews: this was the Zionists. It looked, to be sure, as though only a part of the Jews approved this viewpoint, while the majority condemned and inwardly rejected such a formulation. But...the so-called liberal Jews did not reject the Zionists as non-Jews, but only as Jews with an impractical, perhaps even dangerous, way of publicly avowing their Jewishness. -- PJ 41 -- page 120 There is no better proof of Zionism's classic role as an outrider to anti-Semitism than Hitler's own statement. What more, the reader was to ask, could any reasonable person need? However, before 1914 Hitler had no need to concern himself further with Zionism, as the prospects of a revived Jewish state seemed very remote. It was the Balfour Declaration, Germany's defeat and the Weimar revolution that made him think again about Zionism. Naturally he rolled all three events together. The treacherous Jews showed their true colours in the way in which they welcomed the Balfour Declaration, and it was the Social Democrats, those servants of the Jews, who brought down the Kaiser; but for them Germany would have won. In 1919 Hitler joined the tiny National Socialists and became their inspired beer-hall rabble-rouser, but the dominant ideologist on the finer points of the Jewish question was the Baltic German refugee Alfred Rosenberg, who had developed his theories while still in his native Estonia. By 1919 Rosenberg had already explained Zionism in his book, Die Spur des Juden im Wandel der Zeiten (The Trace of the Jews in the Wanderings of Time). It was just another Jewish hustle; the Zionists only wanted to create a hide-out for the international Jewish conspiracy. Jews were, by their racial nature, organically incapable of building a state of their own, but he felt that Zionist ideology served wonderfully as a justification for depriving Germany's Jews of their rights and that, perhaps, there was the possibility of future use of the movement for the promotion of Jewish emigration. Hitler soon began to touch on these themes in his talks, and on 6 July 1920 he proclaimed that Palestine was the proper place for the Jews and that only there could they hope to get their rights. Articles supporting emigration to Palestine began appearing in the party organ, the Volkischer Beobachter, after 1920, and periodically party propagandists would return to the point, as did Julius Streicher in a speech given on 20 April 1926 before the Bavarian Landtag. But for Hitler the validity of Zionism only lay in its confirmation that the Jews could never be Germans. In Mein Kampf, he wrote: For while the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that the national consciousness of the Jew finds its satisfaction in the creation of a Palestinian state, the Jews again slyly dupe the dumb goyim. It doesn't even enter their heads to build up a Jewish state for the purpose of living there; all they want is a central organisation for their international world swindle, endowed with its own sovereign rights and removed from the intervention of other states: a haven for convicted scoundrels and a university for budding crooks. Jews lacked the essential racial character to build a state of their own. They were essentially leeches, lacking in natural idealism, and they hated work. He explained: For a state formation to have a definite spatial setting always presupposes an idealistic attitude on the part of the state-race, and especially a correct interpretation of the concept of work. In the exact measure in which this attitude is lacking, any attempt at forming, even of preserving, a spatially delimited state fails. In spite of any early musings about Zionism's efficacy in eventually promoting emigration, the Nazis made no effort to establish any relationship with the local Zionists. On the contrary, when the Zionist Congress met in Vienna in 1925, the Nazis were among those who rioted against their presence. -- PJ 41 -- page 121 NEXT PAGE