2005 -- 2018  AbundantHope.net
Phoenix Journal Selections 
param>Google Translate param>
Semite and "anti-Semite" THE JEWISH QUESTION--FACT OR FANCY [H: Please, I suggest you keep those definitions offered over the past few writings, Handy, for you are going to run into the terrible dilemma facing every writer taking up this so-called issue. There is the perceived and directed, but wrong, definition regarding terms and then there is the real meaning (true meaning). This may well allow you to better understand the very intent of the Protocols themselves.] (IV) The chief difficulty in writing about the Jewish Question is the supersensitiveness of Jews and non-Jews concerning the whole matter. There is a vague feeling that even to openly use the word "Jew," or to expose it nakedly to print, is somehow improper. Polite evasions like "Hebrew" and "Semite", both of which are subject to the criticism of inaccuracy, are timidly essayed, and people pick their way gingerly as if the whole subject were forbidden, until some courageous Jewish thinker comes straight out with the good old word "Jew", and then the constraint is relieved and the air cleared. The word "Jew" is not an epithet; it is a name, ancient and honorable, with significance for every period of human history, past, present and to come. -- PJ 222 -- page. 68 ----------------------------- To this question I have only one answer to give, and it is this: "You are right." This reproach of yours, which--I feel it for certain--is at the bottom of your anti-Semitism, is only too well justified, and upon this common ground I am quite willing to shake hands with you and defend you against any accusation of promoting Race Hatred: If you are anti-Semite, I, the Semite, am an anti-Semite too, and a much more fervent one than even you are... We (Jews) have erred, my friend; we have most grievously erred. And if there was truth in our error 3,000, 2,000, nay, 100 years ago, there is now nothing but falseness and madness, a madness that will produce an even greater misery and an even wider anarchy. I confess it to you, openly and sincerely, and with a sorrow, whose depth and pain an ancient Psalmist, and only he, could moan into this burning universe of ours... We who have posed as the saviours of the world, we who have even boasted of having given it "the" Saviour, we are today nothing else but the world's seducers, its destroyers, its incendiaries, its executioners. We who have promised to lead you to a new Heaven, we have finally succeeded in landing you into a new Hell... There has been no progress, least of all moral progress... And it is just our Morality, which has prohibited all real progress, and--what is worse--which even stands in the way of every future and natural reconstruction in this ruined world of ours... I look at this world, and I shudder at its ghastliness; I shudder all the more as I know the spiritual authors of all this ghastliness. -- PJ 222 -- page. 122 -------------------------- So, let us see what the "Jews" had to say. I might add, before beginning, that just as Jesus replaced Immanuel, so to did the Jews of the chosen title replace Semite to mean themselves. No more than "Jesus" means "Immanuel" does Semite mean Jew. -- PJ 223 -- page. 23 ------------------------- The word "anti-Semitism" is another word which should be eliminated from the English language. "Anti-Semitism" serves only one purpose today. It is used as a "smear word". When so-called or self-styled "Jews" feel that anyone opposes any of their objectives they discredit their victim by applying the word "anti-Semitic" through all the channels they have at their command and under their control I can speak with great authority on that subject. Because so-called or self-styled "Jews" were unable to disprove my public statements in 1946 with regard to the situation in -- PJ 224 -- page. 12 Palestine, they spent millions of dollars to "smear" me as an "anti-Semite" hoping thereby to discredit me in the eyes of the public who were very much interested in what I had to say. Until 1946 I was a "little saint" to all so-called or self-styled "Jews". When I disagreed with them publicly on the Zionist intentions in Palestine I became suddenly "anti-Semite No. 1". It is disgraceful to watch the Christian clergy take up the use of the word "anti-Semitism". They should know better. They know that "anti-Semitism" is a meaningless word in the sense it is used today. They know the correct word is "Judaeophobe". "Anti-Semite" was developed into the "smear-word" it is today because "Semite" is associated with Jesus in the minds of Christians. Christians are accessories in the destruction of the Christian faith by tolerating the use of the smear-word "anti-Semitic" to silence by the most intolerable forms of persecution employing that smear-word Christians who oppose and oppose the evil conspirators. -- PJ 224 -- page. 13 "Oh", you say, "now we are going to get the anti-Semite poking and the Communist intent to take the nations of the world." Well, GOOD FRIENDS, the Semites are NOT the Khazarian so-called Jews and the so-called "Jews" in reference ARE the ones who established and continue the Communist regime so you take your druthers while I offer a thought-provoking (I hope) look at something from your Congressional Record, Thursday, January 10, 1963. I don't believe I need make comment at all for even if you are "POLITICALLY CORRECT" you may yet be able to see the intent of the handwriting on the walls of your globe. -- PJ 224 -- page. 21 ------------------------------ The true racist, who loves what he considers “his own people and cultural uniqueness”, is immediately smeared and persecuted for no other reason than that he has the desire to defend his own native kin, and who is determined to follow God‟s Natural Law according to his own definition of “kind” and practice his cultural traditions. Are the traditional Jews, for instance, not “white”? Are the fair-colored Blacks not “white”? and thus and so? So, what are we actually speaking to in this discussion? The man-conjured unacceptability of being that which you are in freedom and equality! I speak of this “thing” grown like a cancer upon your societies which pull you apart in every direction because you have fallen prey to the intent of exactly that cause. If I speak the word “Zionism” you instantly thrust back “anti-Semite” at me when I speak not of Jews at all. Is it not interesting that the Mormons also are often called Zionists? Do you begin to understand my point? You believe anything that is fed to you through careful psychopolitical means. You are told that the term Zionist is “racist” and wrong and, therefore, you are required to stop the usage of the term. And yet, the very ones who instigate the requirement set up their own organizations called World Zionist Organization (W.Z.O.) and Zionist Occupation Government (Z.O.G.), etc., and publicly announce they are Israeli organizations and yet, when another citizen speaks the term--they are cast down as bigots and racists. This is for the sole purpose of causing you to allow the taking over of your own government and placing it in the hands of the ones who began the “trend” in the first place. -- PJ 23 -- pag. 151 --------------------------- Wait up--I have only just begun and so have you, Brothers seeking Truth and Light. For this wild bunch of the roost became the Khazars who decided to call themselves “Jews” and the true “anti-Semite” is in fact the “Jew” himself! Now, how could that be? Well, I am trying to whet your appetite for MORE information; for it is fascinating to see how the deceiving came to pass. You see, the “good guys” were the ones who descended from Shem, who were highly creative and productive--THEY WERE KNOWN AS SEMITES. On the opposing side were the “cursed Canaanites”, who historically were the anti-Semites, the foes of the tall, fair-haired and blue-eyed descendants of that one, Shem. But the Semites were also recognized as great warriors and they very deftly defeated the Canaanites in every conflict and military encounter--they usually waited until attacked, however, they very often just drove the Canaanites right out of the territory according to the “instructions of God” which they interpreted as meaning to destroy them utterly. But, those “anti-Semites” had great staying power; when driven out of one country, they appeared in another to continue their same type of corruption and betrayal--very flexible, deceitful and willing to corrupt everything and everyone. While the nice Semites were busily establishing one great empire after another, Asshur‟s building the Assyrian Empire, Cyrus the Great building the Persian Empire, and Shem himself creating the great Egyptian civilization, the anti-Semites were developing their own talents. These lovely talents included a great talent for trade and commerce, for travel, for making themselves at home in any country, and among any race of people--and ultimately taking over. Generally, they established their trading colonies along the seacoasts, for they lacked the courage to venture into the great wildernesses of Europe, where the Semites always made themselves at home. They always took that which was established and absorbed and merged within it. The Canaanites always remained true to the precepts of the Will of Canaan; they were (and still are) true to EACH OTHER, REGARDLESS OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES; they are constant in their love of robbery even if they have to distort and corrupt the laws into their own favoring, their love of lewdness, and their hatred of the masters, that is, anyone who tried, or tries, to interfere with their corrupt way of life. They always refused to tell the truth and do, in fact, annually take a vow called Kol Nidre (All Vows) at the time of “Atonement” which says that “all vows taken are null and void according to this vow”. In other words: annually the vow is reaffirmed that “all vows are invalid”. THEY DID AND DO, REFUSE TO TELL THE TRUTH EVEN IF IT WOULD BETTER SERVE THEIR -- PJ 25 -- page. 161 CAUSE AND YOU CAN SEE IT IN ACTION IN EVERY COURTROOM IN THE NATIONS. (Go back and refer to the “PROTOCOLS”.) By remaining loyal to these unchanged precepts, the anti-Semites had at their disposal vital weapons for their war against the people of Shem. The “Shemites”, on the other hand, being fiercely individualistic never hesitated to pit their empires against each other, or even family against family, their overweening pride always taking precedence before any racial or historical imperative. Now, didn‟t you just have a whole bunch of dastardly personages? Ah yes, I believe you see that we all have a great many blunders to set to correct to come again into total perfection of Godliness--whichever path you trudged. These overzealous Shemites (Semites) went about “crusading” and remained invincible for hundreds of years. Meanwhile and simultaneously, the anti-Semites were busily expanding trade routes, and amassing their profits from trade (and to this day, the British aristocracy professes total disdain for anyone who sullies his hands with trade, this being from the ancient prejudice against the Canaanites); with these profits, they eventually became BANKERS TO THE WORLD! (IMPORTANT!!). While these Semite (later “Christian”) crusaders went about crusading and opening up trade routes throughout the known world, they also opened up new avenues for graft and corruption. The Canaanites cleaned up during the Crusades and they amassed ever greater profits from each adventure. When the “Christian Knights” departed for the Crusades, dedicating themselves to the service of Christ (God forbid)--dead or alive-- the Canaanites, who stayed prudently at home awaiting opportunity to knock--recognized it when it did and perfected various schemes to rob the knights of their money and property while they were away “protecting freedom for all and goodness and light whether anyone wanted it or not”. -- PJ 25 -- page. 162 Confused? It all becomes simplistic--the “Semites” are REALLY the “anti- Semites” or Canaanites, the heirs of the Curse of Canaan, whose corrupt acts are dictated by the Will of Canaan; the true Semites are the fair-haired warriors who built one great civilization after another. Then how do you recognize these various forces in today‟s world? BY THEIR DEEDS YE SHALL KNOW THEM”. Those who are engaged in murderous conspiracies, those whose only loyalty is to secret international organizations, -- PJ 25 -- page. 163 NEXT PAGE